EWPP is a programme that stands on Jesus God principles.We believe in letting our ''brotherly love be without hypocrisy, loving thy neighbor as thyself, bearing one anothers burdens'' all in utter care for one another especially the poor, that is our main mission. We desire to provide all the needs a human has to the poor that being food, clothing, housing, education, employment,transport and health.As the Lord God Jesus has set us apart as believers we will not degrade the standard of assistance we are willing to provide to those in need. As we have just begun our manner of operation the money you donate to us will be given to the following charities who focus on these specific areas e.g orphans, homeless individuals,uneducated individuals,unemployed individuals,trustworthy rehab facilities and ext.We personally investigate the charities themselves to see whether they truly do act on their claims and use the finances given to achieve the assignment.

Good question. There’s quite a bit of academic and policy research on how reducing poverty (or more broadly, addressing socioeconomic inequality and unemployment) can help reduce crime, violence, and related social problems — though it's a complex relationship. Below is a summary of key impacts, backed by statistics and studies, plus some caveats.

Key Impacts of Alleviating Poverty on Crime & Social Issues

1. Crime Reduction (Violent Crime, Property Crime, Theft, Robbery)
   
   

   • A U.S. study found that increasing social and public health spending in impoverished areas is strongly associated with lower homicide rates. Specifically, an added investment of US$10,000 per person living in poverty was associated with averting more than 2,600 homicides in a year. (PMC)
     
     

   • In South Africa, a tight link between income inequality (a key dimension of poverty) and crime has been documented. A study shows a positive, linear relationship between local income inequality and violent crime rates at precinct (police station) level. (SpringerLink)
     
     

   • Another South African modeling study (system-dynamics) suggests that improving educational access (reducing education inequality) can reduce robberies in the long run by reducing income inequality — though results take time to materialize. (MDPI)
     
     

   • Subsidized housing (poverty-reduction program) in South Africa: a working paper found that 1,000 new subsidized housing units per 100,000 people was associated with a 5–6% decrease in violent crimes, by reducing housing inequality. (ifo Institut)
     
     

2. Unemployment and Crime
   
   

   • Research shows that unemployment, especially among youth, is strongly correlated with crime. In some cases, lack of legitimate opportunities (jobs) lowers the “opportunity cost” of crime, making criminal activity relatively more attractive. (MDPI)
     
     

   • According to Brookings, youth job-training and workforce programs can reduce violent crime arrests by as much as 45%. (Brookings)
     
     

   • In South Africa, some studies suggest that precinct-level socio-economic factors (unemployment, income) help explain crime patterns; though findings are mixed depending on crime type. (Africa Portal)
     
     

3. Economic Cost of Crime
   
   

   • The World Bank estimates that crime in South Africa costs the economy at least 10% of GDP per year — when considering stolen property, spending on protection (security, insurance), and lost economic opportunities. (World Bank)
     
     

   • From a U.S. policy hearing, poverty-related crime costs were elaborated: incarceration, policing, victim services, and economic losses. For example, they estimated that preventing one child from a life of crime can save society ~US$2 million, considering lifetime costs. (GovInfo)
     
     

4. Mental Health, Drug Abuse, and Gang Activity
   
   

   • While direct quantitative statistics on how exactly poverty alleviation reduces gangsterism and drug abuse are less common in the literature (since these are mediated by many factors), there's strong theoretical and empirical support: poverty and lack of economic opportunity are key drivers of gang recruitment, as individuals seek income, identity, and social capital. Research highlights that structural deprivation (inequality, lack of jobs) fuels social strain and alienation, which are risk factors for gang involvement. (ResearchGate)
     
     

   • On mental health: social assistance / welfare programs are often linked to better health and lower levels of stress, which in turn can reduce risk of crime. That said, a systematic review of social assistance programs in high-income countries found that while recipients often report worse health than non-recipients, these programs can reduce some forms of harm. (BioMed Central)
     
     

   • During COVID-19 in some African countries, studies found that anti-poverty welfare measures reduced the likelihood of riots, food-related conflicts, and violence; each additional welfare policy reduced the probability of these by ~0.2 percentage points. (arXiv)
     
     

Interpretation & Caveats

• Causality is complex: While many studies show correlations between poverty (or inequality) and crime, proving direct causality is difficult. Crime is multi-causal (social, cultural, policing, legal systems, education, etc.).
  
  

• Time lags: Some interventions (like education) take a long time to translate into crime reductions, especially for structural crimes like robbery. (MDPI)
  
  

• Targeting matters: Not all social spending is equally effective. How money is allocated (health services, housing, education) changes the impact.
  
  

• Local context: Effects differ by country. What works in the U.S. might not map perfectly onto South Africa (or other countries), due to differences in institutional capacity, social structure, policing, inequality, etc.
  
  

• Measurement challenges: Crime data can be under-reported; welfare impact might not always be captured in short-term crime statistics.
  
  

Bottom Line (Impact Summary)

• Reducing poverty / inequality can significantly reduce violent crime (homicide, robbery) by addressing root causes like strain, lack of opportunity, and social exclusion.
  
  

• Employment programs, especially for youth, are among the most effective public safety strategies — not just for economic mobility, but crime prevention.
  
  

• Targeted social investment (housing, health, education) can pay for itself in terms of crime reduction and long-term social costs.
  
  

• Policymakers aiming to reduce crime sustainably should not rely solely on policing but should integrate poverty alleviation, economic programs, and social services.